No football team needed, vote ‘no’ in October

Published on August 31, 2009 by Gage Thompson

KSU is a curious college. It was a junior college for a commuter population and now is trying so gosh darned hard to grow up big and strong like the other schools on the playground.

It might be like a flagship university one day, but right now it’s in that awkward teenage phase: covered with zits and desperately wanting to fit in. First it was the dining hall. All the other kids had a dining hall, so KSU had to go buy one. Fine. Everyone wants to fit in sometimes. Now KSU wants a football team.  This is where the line should be drawn.

KSU doesn’t need a football team. KSU is a fine school right now, and a football team isn’t going to add anything to the quality of education. In fact, it will probably subtract from it considering the increase in drinking and all around stupidity that follows football wherever it goes.

Every dollar that is spent on football is a dollar KSU could have spent on frivolities like professors and chairs. Who needs that stuff? And it will cost millions of dollars.  Georgia Tech’s 2010 athletic budget  is close to $4 million in total. Keep in mind they already have their stadium.

KSU has about 20,000 students; to equal Georgia Tech’s budget we would need to shell out $200 per student, and I can guarantee you it’ll cost more than that to build a decent stadium.

The most compelling argument for football is that it will bring greater attention to KSU. I have to concede that it probably will, but is it the right kind of attention? Do we really want KSU to try to emulate these schools? Part of our allure is as a no-nonsense budget school where you can get an education without smelling the fragrant odor of stale beer and old hot dogs. A football program jeopardizes that olfactory well-being.

Has anyone ever considered that our hypothetical football team might stink? I hate to be the one to say it, but the only thing the “The Fighting Owls” have fought lately is traffic.

Would a bad football team enhance our image? No. A bad football team would make us the laughingstock of the region, and a decent football team would destroy our niche as an oasis of sobriety and relative maturity in the University System of Georgia. KSU loses either way.

This issue is a lost cause though. Everyone knows the outcome of this vote. I can only take solace in the fact that I will probably have graduated when the massive tuition hike kicks in.

In the meantime, if I want to pay for the privilege of going to a football game only to see my team lose it isn’t that much of a trip downtown to catch a Falcon’s game. Maybe they’ll finally get the consecutive winning seasons they’ve been chasing for 43 years. I for one won’t be holding my breath for either team.

Responses to "No football team needed, vote ‘no’ in October"

  • Caitlyn Van Orden made a comment on September 1, 2009:

    This is the first column of Gage’s that I’ve agreed with. With our budget already tighter than the volleyball team’s spandex and the economy as a whole in the hole, there’s absolutely no reason for us to be even considering it right now. Officials have already come out and told us that we’d be paying for the team with our student fees - each student is already paying, at minimum, $573 in fees this semester (http://ksusentinel.com/news/all-students-pay-at-least-573-in-fees-this-semester/), and that’s not even including a $50 parking pass if you commute or any meal plan you’re paying for. I like my KSU the way it is. Quit worrying about football and go to the hockey games!!

  • Brian Stewart made a comment on September 13, 2009:

    Wow I can’t believe you are honestly saying that football equals stupidity. Have you ever heard of Georgia Tech, Florida, Vanderbilt, Wake Forest, UNC, Duke, Michigan, or UCLA? In addition, the Ivy League schools also have football teams. All of these schools have very highly rated academic degree programs, as well as generate tremendous value for their respective degree holders.

    You present your case like KSU is some scholarly environment filled with great thinkers that will easily be distracted by childish sporting events. Have you ever looked at the admission requirements? I hate to say it but KSU is NOT known for academics; I’m sorry if you thought you went to a smarter school.

    Is this the right time for KSU football? Maybe not, considering the budgetary conflict facing almost all higher-education institutions. However, in the future, KSU will NEED a football team to eventually become a somewhat respectable national university. With football comes attention, with attention comes increased applications for admission, and when more people apply you can be more selective. Football programs have a direct correlation to the value of your degree. It’s been proven so many times. Just look at how USF and UCF have turned from commuter to nationally known in the past 5 years.

    Your argument is just idiotic.

Leave a Reply

THE SENTINEL encourages on-topic, civil discussion on its articles posted online. It is our policy not to screen comments before they are posted or edit them after they are posted. However, we reserve the right to remove comments that are off-topic, malicious, libelous or include excessive foul language. THE SENTINEL also reserves the right to turn off all comments on any story it deems necessary.

Comments violating copyright law will also be removed.

Users accept the Vistor Agreement.

KSU Student Media staff accept the KSU Media Staff Agreement & Ethics Form.

Users who repeatedly violate this policy will be banned from commenting.

If you have any questions on our comment policy or wish to report a comment that you feel violates these standards, please e-mail a link to the article to the Editor in Chief at eic@ksusentinel.com.

Use your Facebook login or enter in your information below: